From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Single client performance on trivial SELECTs |
Date: | 2011-04-15 21:33:38 |
Message-ID: | 4DA87362020000250003C8DC@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly what is useful to be learned from that
> specific work. But it does suggest two things: one, this is far
> from an easy thing to fix. Two, the only reason MySQL does so
> well on it is because there was some focused work on it, taking a
> quite a while to accomplish, and involving many people. Doing
> better for PostgreSQL is something I see as more of a long-term
> goal, rather than something it would be reasonable to expect quick
> progress on.
Nice research. Thanks for putting that in front of people.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-04-15 22:44:47 | Re: WAL, xl_heap_insert and tuple oid mystry |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-15 21:11:41 | Re: regression test client encoding |