Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
Date: 2011-02-28 10:13:16
Message-ID: 4D6B753C.1010502@cs.helsinki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-02-28 8:20 AM +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja<marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
>> On 2011-02-24 6:40 PM, I wrote:
>>> I am planning on working on the documentation this weekend.
>
>> And here's my attempt. The language is a bit poor at some places but I
>> can't think of anything better.
>
> Applied after some rather heavy editorialization.

Thanks again.

>> I tried to be more strict about using "subquery" when talking about
>> WITHs in general since INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE is not a subquery in my book.
>
> I undid most of those changes --- it didn't seem to add anything to be
> strict in this way, and anyway you hadn't done it consistently,
> eg the syntax still had "with_query".

I wasn't so sure about those changes either. It does seem more
consistent this way.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Sontakke 2011-02-28 12:04:03 PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls
Previous Message Yeb Havinga 2011-02-28 09:31:57 Re: Sync Rep v17