Re: sepgsql contrib module

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)EU(dot)NEC(dot)COM>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sepgsql contrib module
Date: 2011-02-15 02:15:19
Message-ID: 4D59E1B7.7030006@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/14/2011 08:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Yeah. The next thing I hit was this:
>> [andrew(at)aurelia sepgsql]$ make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile
>> sepgsql-regtest.pp
>> cat: /selinux/mls: No such file or directory
>> make: *** No rule to make target `sepgsql-regtest.pp'. Stop.
>> [andrew(at)aurelia sepgsql]$
> Hmph. A build with --with-selinux goes through for me on a
> pretty-vanilla Fedora 13 installation (at least the build and install
> steps, I dunno how to test it).
>
> It looks to me like /selinux/mls is some weird phony-filesystem file,
> because "cat" prints one character (a "1") while "ls" claims the file is
> of zero length. So it's probably something consed up by the kernel,
> like /proc/. Do you have selinux enabled on your machine?

Np, but that really shouldn't be a build requirement, ISTM, even if it
is a test requirement.

> (BTW, testing what seems to be a kernel-configuration-reporting flag at
> build time strikes me as pretty awful design.)
>
>

Yeah, I agree.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2011-02-15 02:21:21 Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-02-15 02:07:54 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic Recovery Control functions for use in Hot Standby. Pause,