| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 23:28:30 |
| Message-ID: | 4D3870BE0200002500039922@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Why not? We already generate appropriate snapshots for this in
> SSI, so is the problem in getting the appropriate information into
> the WAL stream or in having a request for a snapshot within a
> serializable transaction while running in hot standby the problem?
I dropped few words.
That was supposed to ask whether the problem was in getting hot
standby to *use such a snapshot*.
I'm open to other suggestions on how else we might do this. I don't
see any alternatives, but maybe you're seeing some possibility that
eludes me.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-01-20 23:28:36 | Re: Orphaned statements issue |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-01-20 23:26:49 | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |