| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Date: | 2010-12-24 23:37:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4D152EB6.6000407@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/24/2010 06:26 PM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad
>> enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say,
>> search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community.
> Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"...
>
> And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less*
> ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to
> keep going back to gmane's search)
>
>
It's deja vu all over again. See mailing list archives for details.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-12-24 23:46:07 | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-12-24 23:26:43 | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |