Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Date: 2010-12-08 23:16:26
Message-ID: 4D0011CA.7040606@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.12.2010 00:10, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 08.12.2010 16:00, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Heikki pointed out to me that the btree delete record processing does
>> not respect vacuum_defer_cleanup_age. It should.
>>
>> Attached patch to implement that.
>>
>> Looking to commit in next few hours barring objections/suggestions, to
>> both HEAD and 9_0_STABLE, in time for next minor release.
>
> Please note that it was Noah Misch that raised this a while ago:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01919.php

On closer look, that's not actually the same issue, sorry for the noise..

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-12-08 23:34:03 Re: serializable read only deferrable
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-08 23:10:23 Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age