Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Date: 2010-12-08 00:39:39
Message-ID: 4CFED3CB.3000102@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/07/2010 07:32 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:00 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
>> xof(at)thebuild(dot)com (Christophe Pettus) writes:
>>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> Because nobody sane uses OSX on the server?
>>> The XServe running 10.5 server and 9.0.1 at the other end of the
>>> office takes your remark personally. :)
>> I'd heard that Apple had cancelled XServe. [Poking back at that...]
>>
>> Yep, they won't be carrying anything for sale that's particularly
>> rack-mountable after next January. Not precisely "dead," but definitely
>> moving on smelling funny...
> A bit off topic but Apple is actually marketing OSX Server on the mini
> (with RAID 1). Which honestly for 95% of the businesses out there would
> make a very nice, reasonably performant database server for say....
> PostBooks, or Drupal.
>

Given the constant overheating I have had on my mini, I wouldn't use it
to host anything much ;-) But I guess YMMV.

cheers

andrerw

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-12-08 00:45:48 Re: serializable read only deferrable
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-12-08 00:32:19 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes