Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

From: Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date: 2010-12-06 20:33:14
Message-ID: 4CFD488A.4020406@mdibl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> SYNONYMS work for things that aren't a table.
>
> The idea of synonyms for non-table things was pretty much rejected
> already on the -hackers thread.

Again, in Oracle, we found synonyms on stored procedures and functions
as well as tables to be key.

/m

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael C Rosenstein 2010-12-06 20:34:56 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-12-06 20:31:02 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?