Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joachim Wieland" <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2010-12-06 18:28:39
Message-ID: 4CFCD6F70200002500038363@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:

>> Surely you can predict that any snapshot is no larger than a fairly
>> small fixed portion plus sizeof(TransactionId) * MaxBackends?
>
> No. See subtransactions.

Subtransactions are included in snapshots?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-06 18:36:37 Re: allow COPY routines to read arbitrary numbers of fields
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-06 18:24:27 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump