Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net" <w(dot)p(dot)dijkstra(at)mgrid(dot)net>
Subject: Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
Date: 2010-12-04 18:56:35
Message-ID: 4CFA8EE3.50509@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/04/2010 01:22 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>
> Given such an agenda, I'd argue for a feature branch being open for
> partitioning so that incremental reviewed work can happen there until we
> have enough pieces to consider merging into HEAD.
>
>

Anyone can create a branch and publish it. That's the democracy that git
allows. So if you want it, don't argue for it, just do it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-12-04 19:08:20 Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-12-04 18:25:21 Re: knngist - 0.8