From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: contrib: auth_delay module |
Date: | 2010-11-19 07:57:03 |
Message-ID: | 4CE62DCF.5050506@ak.jp.nec.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2010/11/18 2:17), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Ross J. Reedstrom<reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:41:37PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:15 PM, KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> If we don't need a PoC module for each new hooks, I'm not strongly
>>>> motivated to push it into contrib tree.
>>>> How about your opinion?
>>>
>>> I'd say let it go, unless someone else feels strongly about it.
>>
>> I would use this module (rate limit new connection attempts) as soon as
>> I could. Putting a cap on potential CPU usage on a production DB by either
>> a blackhat or mistake by a developer caused by a mistake in
>> configuration (leaving the port accessible) is definitely useful, even
>> in the face of max_connections. My production apps already have
>> their connections and seldom need new ones. They all use CPU though.
>
> If KaiGai updates the code per previous discussion, would you be
> willing to take a crack at adding documentation?
>
> P.S. Your email client seems to be setting the Reply-To address to a
> ridiculous value.
>
OK, I'll revise my patch according to the previous discussion.
Please wait for about one week. I have a big event in this weekend.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-19 08:07:14 | Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-11-19 07:54:07 | Fwd: patch: format function - fixed oid |