| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
| Date: | 2010-11-16 21:34:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4CE2F8DA.3010001@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/16/2010 02:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I think if you do a regular backup of the complete database, unlogged
>> tables should come out empty, but if you specifically request a dump of
>> it, it shouldn't.
> Oh, wow. That seems confusing.
Yeah. And unnecessary. If you want it excluded we already have a switch
for that.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-16 21:37:06 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2010-11-16 21:34:04 | Re: Per-column collation |