Re: WIP: extensible enums

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date: 2010-11-14 20:58:17
Message-ID: 4CE04D69.7040907@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> I'd say put it on and mark it with an [E]. We could use some more
>> [E]asy items for that list.
>
> We don't need to add marginally-useful features just because they're
> easy. If it doesn't have a real use-case, the incremental maintenance
> cost of more code is a good reason to reject it.

I'll bite.

Use-case:

1) DBA adds "Department Role" enum, with set
{'Director','Secretary','Staff','Support','Temporary','Liason'}.

2) 3-person data entry team updates all employee records with those roles.

3) First summary report is run.

4) Manager points out that "Liason" is misspelled.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2010-11-14 21:04:41 Re: Bug in plpython's Python Generators
Previous Message Darren Duncan 2010-11-14 20:55:46 Re: Refactoring the Type System