Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Date: 2010-11-14 16:08:18
Message-ID: 4CE00972.1010106@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 11/14/2010 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> And on the fourth hand, what we're buying here is pretty marginal for
> developers and of no interest whatever for users.
>
> I still think it's worth looking into whether the bug can be dodged
> by shortening the eval calls. But if not, I think I'd vote for
> reverting. Maybe we could revisit this in a couple of years.

+1

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-14 16:24:08 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-14 16:08:13 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-14 16:24:08 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-14 16:08:13 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support