Re: WIP: extensible enums

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date: 2010-11-12 18:50:00
Message-ID: 4CDD8C58.1020802@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/12/2010 01:40 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> FYI, I marked the TODO item for adding enums as completed. The TODO
> item used to also mention renaming or removing enums, but I have seen
> few requests for that so I removed that suggestion. We can always
> re-add it if there is demand.

Renaming an item would not be terribly hard. Removing one is that nasty
case. There are all sorts of places the old value could be referred to:
table data, view definitions, check constraints, functions etc.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-12 18:53:40 Re: [HACKERS] locales and encodings Oh MY!
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-12 18:40:28 Re: WIP: extensible enums