Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,<chuck(at)jumis(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL
Date: 2010-11-09 12:46:09
Message-ID: 4CD8EE310200002500037425@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Charles Pritchard's message:

>> I don't believe the webmaster is granted free rein:
>> Disk quotas are enforced, data is separated per origin,
>> hanging processes are up to the implementer, and postgres has
>> plenty of settings for that.
>
> The day a privilege escalation is found and some webserver runs
> "pg_read_file()" on your browser, will be a sad one indeed.

Personally, I feel somewhat more safe about trusting PostgreSQL on
this than JavaScript, Java applets, a Flash plug-in, and cookies --
all of which are enabled in my browser. Sure, I occasionally hit an
ill-behaved page and need to xkill my browser. I don't visit that
site again. And it really doesn't happen to me very often.

Can you can make a case that this proposal is more dangerous than
having all the above enabled?

-Kevin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-11-09 12:46:37 Re: security hooks on object creation
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-11-09 12:11:28 Re: Hot Standby b-tree delete records review