Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-21 20:21:12
Message-ID: 4CC0A0B8.9050103@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/20/10 6:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I find it impossible to believe that's
> a good decision, and IMHO we should be focusing on how to make the
> parameters PGC_SIGHUP rather than PGC_POSTMASTER, which would give us
> most of the same benefits without throwing away hard-won performance.

I'd be happy to accept that. Is it possible, though?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-10-21 20:22:18 Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-21 20:19:42 Re: Exposing an installation's default value of unix_socket_directory