Re: Issues with Quorum Commit

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Date: 2010-10-07 09:46:00
Message-ID: 4CAD96D8.50405@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/06/2010 10:01 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The code to implement your desired option is
> more complex and really should come later.

I'm sorry, but I think of that exactly the opposite way. The timeout for
automatic continuation after waiting for a standby is the addition. The
wait state of the master is there anyway, whether or not it's bound by a
timeout. The timeout option should thus come later.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-10-07 09:52:13 Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-10-07 09:34:55 Re: queriing the version of libpq