Re: leaky views, yet again

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: leaky views, yet again
Date: 2010-10-07 06:02:43
Message-ID: 4CAD6283.4090908@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.10.2010 06:39, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Right, *column* filtering seems easy and entirely secure. The angst
>> here is about row filtering. Can we have a view in which users can see
>> the values of a column for some rows, with perfect security that they
>> can't identify values for the hidden rows? The stronger form is that
>> they shouldn't even be able to tell that hidden rows exist, which is
>> something your view doesn't try to do; but there are at least some
>> applications where that would be desirable.
>
> I took a crack at documenting the current behavior; see attached.

Looks good. It gives the impression that you need to be able to a create
custom function to exploit, though. It would be good to mention that
internal functions can be used too, revoking access to CREATE FUNCTION
does not make you safe.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-10-07 06:38:32 Re: todo point: plpgsql - scrollable cursors are supported
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-10-07 03:45:55 Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf