Re: Basic JSON support

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic JSON support
Date: 2010-10-05 00:00:09
Message-ID: 4CAA6A89.4080508@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

All,

> But having said that, I wonder whether bison/flex are really the best
> tool for the job in the first place. From what I understand of JSON
> (which admittedly ain't much) a bison parser seems like overkill:
> it'd probably be both bloated and slow compared to a simple handwritten
> recursive-descent parser.

This appears not to be necessary. The author of JSONval has indicated
that, should we choose to include it in PostgreSQL 9.1, he is open to
re-licensing.

So on a completely *technical* basis, do we want to use JSONval?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-05 01:09:12 Re: Basic JSON support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-04 23:45:00 Re: Basic JSON support