Re: Git cvsserver serious issue

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git cvsserver serious issue
Date: 2010-09-23 15:17:35
Message-ID: 4C9B6F8F.9060806@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers

On 09/23/2010 10:58 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> Back to a question you asked earlier, what exactly still depends on
> CVS right now, as in which buildfarm animals, what parts of the NLS
> processes? Also as you asked earlier, what else?

At least one buildfarm member, spoonbill, is known to have issues with
git. This machine, because of the flags it uses, has found numerous bugs
for us in the past and is quite important for us to maintain (a direct
counter argument to your suggestion of dropping platforms that don't
support git).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-23 15:18:52 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-23 15:16:46 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-23 15:18:52 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-23 15:16:46 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue