Re: snapshot generation broken

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot generation broken
Date: 2010-09-22 11:28:48
Message-ID: 4C99E870.9080507@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
>>> will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
>>> export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
>>> can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it
>>> to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for
>>> backbranches.
>> We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
>> releases.
>
> Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of course)

how exactly should people fix their BF members - is there any howto or
such on how to deal with the new git2cvs gateway?
Switching to git entirely is rather hard for some of my members for
example - at least not without investing hours of work...

Stefan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-09-22 11:30:06 Re: BUG #5661: The character encoding in logfile is confusing.
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-09-22 11:27:24 Re: snapshot generation broken