Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Date: 2010-09-21 22:04:42
Message-ID: 4C992BFA.2050204@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/21/2010 05:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 9/20/10 10:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 21/09/10 04:18, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> ... or did we just forget to remove it?
>> Backwards-compatibility? ;-) There hasn't been any pressing reason to
>> remove it.
> Any application which needed it (like OpenACS) just got broken when we
> removed add_missing_from. Let alone the typecasting changes in 8.3.

Umm, no. One of our customers has sponsored work to allow OpenACS to run
on 9.0[1] (they REALLY want to be able to use hot standby) ;-) One of my
tasks this week is to set up 9.0 for them on a VM where they will test
these changes. But default_with_oids is really quite a different issue.

cheers

andrew

[1] see <http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message_id=3468735>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-21 22:05:40 Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-21 22:02:18 Re: repository size differences