Re: Git conversion status

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Date: 2010-09-21 18:17:47
Message-ID: 4C98F6CB.3090704@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21/09/10 21:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> While we're discussing possible errors on that page ... at the bottom of
> the page under the "multiple workdirs" alternative are these recipes for
> re-syncing your local checkouts:
>
> git checkout REL9_0_STABLE
> git pull
>
> git checkout master
> git reset --hard origin/master
>
> Are the git checkout steps really needed, considering each workdir would
> normally be on its target branch all the time?

No, you're right, they're not really needed. Those steps were
copy-pasted from the "Committing Using a Single Clone" recipe, and not
adjusted.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-09-21 18:21:52 Re: .gitignore files, take two
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-09-21 18:16:10 Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo