Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
Date: 2010-09-21 08:21:50
Message-ID: 4C986B1E.5020300@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs írta:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:22 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> That said, there's a few small things that can be progressed regardless of
>>> the details of synchronous replication. There's the changes to trigger
>>> failover with a signal, and it seems that we'll need some libpq changes to
>>> allow acknowledgments to be sent back to the master regardless of the rest
>>> of the design. We can discuss those in separate threads in parallel.
>>>
>> Agreed. The attached patch introduces new function which is used
>> to send ACK back from walreceiver. The function sends a message
>> to XLOG stream by calling PQputCopyData. Also I allowed PQputCopyData
>> to be called even during COPY OUT.
>>
>
> Does this differ from Zoltan's code?
>

Somewhat. See my other mail to Tom.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2010-09-21 08:23:28 Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-09-21 08:21:00 Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication