Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?

From:	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To:	Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Date:	2010-09-21 05:59:53
Message-ID:	4C9849D9.4010906@enterprisedb.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2010-09-21 01:18:57 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>  2010-09-21 05:59:53 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>   2010-09-21 21:15:07 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>    2010-09-21 22:04:42 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>    2010-09-21 22:05:40 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2010-09-21 22:16:23 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>      2010-09-21 22:31:43 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>       2010-09-21 22:40:25 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>       2010-09-22 06:24:55 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>        2010-09-22 16:17:08 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>     2010-09-21 22:25:21 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? at 2010-09-21 01:18:57 from Josh Berkus

Responses

• Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? at 2010-09-21 21:15:07 from Josh Berkus

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Simon Riggs	2010-09-21 06:36:12	Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Previous Message	Mark Kirkwood	2010-09-21 05:44:47	Re: Pg_upgrade performance