| From: | Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2010-09-17 16:24:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4C939653.8030408@krogh.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-09-17 10:09, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I think it makes most sense to set sync vs. async in the master, and
> the level of synchronicity in the slave. Although I have sympathy
> for the argument that it's simpler if you configure it all from the
> master side as well.
Just a comment as a sysadmin, It would be hugely beneficial if the
master and slaves all was able to run from the "exact same" configuration
file. This would leave out any doubt of the configuration of the
"complete cluster"
in terms of debugging. Slave would be able to just "copy" over the masters
configuration, etc. etc.
I dont know if it is doable or has any huge backsides.
--
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-17 18:49:54 | pgsql: Move pg_db_role_setting docs to correct place in alphabetical |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-09-17 16:00:29 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-17 16:27:06 | CVS to Git conversion: second try Monday |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-09-17 16:01:18 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |