Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Date: 2010-09-16 17:20:51
Message-ID: 4C9251F3.1070408@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Morning,

On 09/16/2010 04:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I agree. I've already said my piece on how I think that stuff would
> need to be reworked to be acceptable, so we might have to agree to
> disagree on those, especially if your goal is to get something
> committed that doesn't involve a major rewrite on your end.

Just for clarification: you are referring to imessages and dynshmem
here, right? I agree that dynshmem needs to be reworked and rethought.
And imessages simply depends on dynshmem.

If you are referring to the bgworker stuff, I'm not quite clear about
what I could do to make bgworker more acceptable. (Except perhaps for
removing the dependency on imessages).

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-16 17:22:20 Re: [BUGS] BUG #5305: Postgres service stops when closing Windows session
Previous Message Tomáš Kovářík 2010-09-16 17:11:25 Re: Server crash during simple c-language function