Re: BUG #5656: parameter 'client_min_messages' accept values not listed in enumvals

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, thommy <der(dot)thommy(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5656: parameter 'client_min_messages' accept values not listed in enumvals
Date: 2010-09-14 18:47:15
Message-ID: 4C8FC333.3030809@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian escreveu:
> We are basically reusing the same validation code for this and other
> min_messages settings.
>
No, we have two enums ({client,server}_message_level_options); I don't
understand why we should have these options in client_min_messages enum.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-14 18:57:00 Re: BUG #5656: parameter 'client_min_messages' accept values not listed in enumvals
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-14 18:12:11 Re: BUG #5656: parameter 'client_min_messages' accept values not listed in enumvals