Re: git: uh-oh

On 07/09/10 21:25, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 22:06, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or
>>>> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with
>>>> git-filter-branch?
>>>
>>> I think that "the latest issue here" is the issue of how files get
>>> added to branches, which we discussed before with pretty much the same
>>> set of conclusions. I'm not wild about the way that's getting
>>> converted, but I'm not sure I care enough about it to argue with Tom.
>>> However, I want to convince myself that the deletes we've done over
>>> the years have been properly handled. I need to look at Max's latest
>>> conversion and I'll look at yours as well.
>>
>> Magnus -
>>
>> I just looked at your latest conversion (based on what Max did) and it
>> looks a lot better. I think, though, that we should re-remove these
>> branches:
>>
>> origin/unlabeled-1.44.2
>> origin/unlabeled-1.51.2
>> origin/unlabeled-1.59.2
>> origin/unlabeled-1.87.2
>> origin/unlabeled-1.90.2
>
> Oh yeah, I did the push before I ran that step of my script. Oops, sorry.
>

Speaking of which, could you update the public copy of all the
conversion documentation / machinery?

Thanks,
Max.