Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date: 2010-08-18 18:49:15
Message-ID: 4C6C2B2B.9060501@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> What I find interesting about that trace is the large proportion of
> writes. That appears to me to indicate that it's *not* a matter of
> vacuum delays, or at least not just a matter of that. The process seems
> to be getting involved in having to dump dirty buffers to disk. Perhaps
> the background writer is malfunctioning?

You appear to be correct in that it's write-related. Will be testing on
what specificially is producing it.

Note that this is one of two ostensibly duplicate servers, and the issue
has never appeared on the other server.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-18 19:00:10 Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2010-08-18 17:55:58 Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept