Re: security label support, part.2

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2
Date: 2010-08-17 16:50:41
Message-ID: 4C6A7791020000250003476A@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

> Let's not build the complication of dealing with inheiritance/
> child relations into the external security system when we're in
> the middle of trying to get rid of that distinction in core PG
> though.

I didn't realize we were trying to do that. I know we're working on
making partitioning easier, but there hasn't been a decision to stop
supporting other uses of inheritance, has there?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-17 17:12:23 Re: Progress indication prototype
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2010-08-17 16:44:00 Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown