Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date: 2010-08-17 00:30:00
Message-ID: 4C69D808.8040007@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Another idea that comes to mind is that you have vacuum_cost_page_dirty
> set to an unreasonably large value, so that autovac is blocking whenever
> it has to write even one page.

Nope. Default. And total cost was raised to 1000.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-08-17 00:31:45 Re: security label support, part.2
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-08-17 00:19:06 Re: shared_preload_libraries is ignored in single user mode