Re: Testing Sandforce SSD

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Date: 2010-08-03 00:07:43
Message-ID: 4C575DCF.3050700@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> That doesn't make much sense unless there's some special advantage to a
> 4K blocksize with the hardware itself.

Given that pgbench is always doing tiny updates to blocks, I wouldn't be
surprised if switching to smaller blocks helps it in a lot of situations
if one went looking for them. Also, as you point out, pgbench runtime
varies around wildly enough that 10% would need more investigation to
really prove that means something. But I think Yeb has done plenty of
investigation into the most interesting part here, the durability claims.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-08-03 00:12:41 Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Previous Message Maciek Sakrejda 2010-08-02 22:37:21 Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite