Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Date: 2010-07-17 17:06:14
Message-ID: 4C41E306.7090205@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/17/2010 09:25 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I was concerned about its interaction with the other serializable
> patch (by myself and Dan Ports), so I also combined the patches and
> tested. Florian's pgbench test did expose bugs in the *other*
> patch, which I then fixed in the combined setting. There was still
> some breakage in the other patch when Florian's patch was backed
> out, so at the moment, this patch would appear to be a
> *prerequisite* for the other. (That can hopefully be corrected
> by changes to the other patch.)

I am currently reading the Cahill paper [1] in preparation for reviewing
your patch [2]. Should I be installing Florian's patch in addition to
yours when I start testing? Also, where can I get the latest and
greatest version of your patch?

Thanks,

Joe

[1]
http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/5353/1/michael-cahill-2009-thesis.pdf

[2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=310

--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-07-17 17:13:11 Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-07-17 16:25:20 Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle