| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dblink regression failure in HEAD |
| Date: | 2010-07-13 03:32:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4C3BDE50.8010403@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I found regression test for dblink in HEAD was failed on my machine.
>> One buildfarm machine also reported the same failure.
>>
>
> What this looks like to me is that dblink.c doesn't contain the fix
> that the new regression test is checking for.
>
> pangolin is pulling from the git mirror, which I still don't trust
> further than I can throw it. How about you?
>
>
>
There is something very odd about that machine. It started failing 5
days ago. Then it stopped, then it started again.
As for the git mirror, I can only speak for the mirror I maintain, which
is validated on every live branch every day against CVS, so far without
a hiccup, and has four of my buildfarm members happily building against
it (and possibly others).
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-13 04:25:52 | Re: dblink regression failure in HEAD |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-07-13 03:22:13 | Re: dblink regression failure in HEAD |