Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL

I just used standard mkfs for each filesystem and mounted them without
options, unless otherwise specified.

On 6/4/10 1:37 PM, Bryan Hinton wrote:
> What types of journaling on each fs?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jon Schewe <jpschewe(at)mtu(dot)net
> <mailto:jpschewe(at)mtu(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> On 6/4/10 9:33 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Friday 04 June 2010 16:25:30 Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de <mailto:andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>>
> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish
> >>>> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish
> >>>> ext3: 15 minutes to finish
> >>>> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish
> >>>>
> >>> My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier
> differences.
> >>> ext4 uses barriers by default, ext3 does not.
> >>>
> >> Or, to put it more clearly: the reason ext3 is fast is that
> it's unsafe.
> >>
> > Jon: To verify you can enable it via the barrier=1 option during
> mounting..
> >
> >
> >
> First some details:
> Linux kernel 2.6.31
> postgres version: 8.4.2
>
> More test results:
> reiserfs: ~1 hour 50 minutes
> ext3 barrier=1: ~15 minutes
> ext4 nobarrier: ~15 minutes
> jfs: ~15 minutes
>
> --
> Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe <http://mtu.net/%7Ejpschewe>
> If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital
> signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
> (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
>

--
Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe
If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital
signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information.