Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-05-26 23:22:40
Message-ID: 4BFDAD40.4040107@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Just this second posted about that, as it turns out.
>
> I have a v3 *almost* ready of the keepalive patch. It still makes sense
> to me after a few days reflection, so is worth discussion and review. In
> or out, I want this settled within a week. Definitely need some R&R
> here.

Does the keepalive fix all the issues with max_standby_delay? Tom?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-05-26 23:34:52 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-05-26 23:18:12 Re: Synchronization levels in SR