| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |
| Date: | 2010-01-07 19:51:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4B463B32.2010707@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I am really reluctant to go through another cycle of giving a big
> feature as much time as humanly possible before bouncing it, and then
> bouncing it anyway, and I fear that is what will happen. I don't
> believe this patch has had a major rewrite since it was submitted for
> the September CommitFest, and if 4 months hasn't been enough time to
> get it committed, then why do we think the magic number is 5 rather
> than 6 or 8 or anything else? If someone has a concrete answer to
> that question, I am all ears, but I feel like we're operating mostly
> on hope.
I think Heikki needs to speak to this. I know that he's now working
hard on SR, but I have no idea what his timeline is.
--Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-07 19:55:29 | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-07 19:45:41 | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |