Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-07 19:07:19
Message-ID: 4B4630E7.5060805@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Well, the argument to my mind is about a suitable value of "RSN".
> I think you were stating that we should bounce SR if it's not committed
> before the final commitfest starts (ie, next week). I think we can give
> it more slack than that. Maybe the end of the fest (where the length of
> the fest is determined by the other open patches)?

Yes. I think there's tremendous value to PG if we could get HS+SR into
8.5. And I know that SR is what Heikki is working on exclusively.

If we find that working on SR is causing us not to have time for other
patch review, then we can revisit the decision.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-01-07 19:09:33 Re: PostgreSQL 8.5 Open Items
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2010-01-07 19:04:28 Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full