| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
| Date: | 2009-12-10 15:52:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4B211953.4060807@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't think IO is a terrible name for an option but I like BUFFERS
> better. I don't think the BUFFERS/BLOCKS confusion is too bad, but
> perhaps we could use BUFFERS in both places.
>
I don't know how "blocks" got into here in the first place--this concept
is "buffers" just about everywhere else already, right?
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-10 15:53:36 | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-10 15:50:43 | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |