Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Date: 2009-12-09 08:35:21
Message-ID: 4B1F6149.9020004@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki escreveu:
> Sure, I should have merge all of the comments. Patch attached.
>
Thanks for your effort. Looks sane to me.

> - Updated the output format as follows. I think this format is the most
> similar to existing lines. ("actual" by ANALYZE and "Filter:").
>
If people object to it, we can always change it later.

> IMHO, we could remove those options completely because we can use
> EXPLAIN BUFFERS and DTrace probes instead of them.
>
+1. But we need to propose some replacement options.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-12-09 09:17:17 Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Previous Message Massa, Harald Armin 2009-12-09 08:31:35 Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]