Re: YAML

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML
Date: 2009-12-08 14:13:10
Message-ID: 4B1E5EF6.9030301@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> I've no contribution to the main topic, but I'd like to point out that
> the "JSON is a subset of YAML" meme is not without controversy:
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/JSON-XS-2.26/XS.pm#JSON_and_YAML
>
> It may not be relevant in your use-case, but I thought it worth a mention.
>
>
>

Ouch. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

Well, if we're going to commit this, as now appears likely, we should
have some language lawyers go over our code for both YAML and JSON with
a fine tooth comb to make sure what we are producing is strictly
According To Hoyle.

cheers

andrew

In response to

  • Re: YAML at 2009-12-08 13:16:42 from Tim Bunce

Responses

  • Re: YAML at 2009-12-08 14:17:59 from Robert Haas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-08 14:17:59 Re: YAML
Previous Message Tim Bunce 2009-12-08 13:16:42 Re: YAML