| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
| Date: | 2009-12-08 05:05:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4B1DDE9D.20303@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> I could live with the equals signs, but the use of parentheses seems
> weird and inconsistent with normal english usage (which permits
> parentheses as a means of making parenthetical comments).
But it is consistent with people seeing:
Seq Scan on foo (cost=0.00..155.00 rows=10000 width=4)
Which seems to be what was being emulated here. I though that was
pretty reasonable given this is a related feature.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2009-12-08 06:01:04 | Re: questions about concurrency control in Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2009-12-08 04:46:56 | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |