From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot standby, recent changes |
Date: | 2009-12-07 08:02:36 |
Message-ID: | 4B1CB69C.8030504@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:26 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, this doesn't seem particularly unlikely or
>> unusual to me.
>
> I don't know many people who shutdown both nodes of a highly available
> application at the same time. If they did, I wouldn't expect them to
> complain they couldn't run queries on the standby when an two obvious
> and simple workarounds exist to allow them to access their data: start
> the master again, or make the standby switchover, both of which are part
> of standard operating procedures.
It might not be common or expected in a typical HA installation, but it
would be a very strange limitation in my mind. It might well happen e.g
in a standby used for reporting, or when you do PITR.
> It doesn't seem very high up the list of additional features, at least.
Well, it's in the patch now. I'm just asking you to not break it.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-12-07 08:13:20 | Re: Reading recovery.conf earlier |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-07 08:00:33 | Re: Reading recovery.conf earlier |