Re: named generic constraints [feature request]

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: named generic constraints [feature request]
Date: 2009-11-24 03:44:26
Message-ID: 4B0B569A.5040306@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Caleb,

I can understand why you want this. However, it would be tricky to
implement because of data typing, and is fairly easily worked around
using either domains or functions. So I don't think anyone is going to
want to add it to the TODO list, sorry.

Of course, Postgres is fully hackable if you *really* want it.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-11-24 04:27:03 Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-11-24 03:13:26 Re: WIP: log query in auto-explain