| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Harald Armin Massa <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
| Date: | 2009-10-21 15:14:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4ADF254D.50801@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>
>> (or whatever name we choose for this in place of PGAPPNAME.)
>>
>
> FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what
> Dave has been using in his examples. The latter is too frickin
> long, and the double N is a typo threat (I already mistyped it in
> composing this message...)
>
>
>
Well, the latter argument suggests we should use an underscore ...
We don't usually use abbreviations, so how about PGCLIENTNAME or some such?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-21 15:25:48 | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-21 14:56:56 | Re: Application name patch - v2 |