Re: Application name patch - v2

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Harald Armin Massa" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Date: 2009-10-20 16:07:45
Message-ID: 4ADD9A01020000250002BBA3@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> if your software is written to depend on the appname being set a
> particular way

then you're not using for its intended purpose, I should think. Since
any client can set this to whatever they want, having the application
name as a default, rather than NULL (at least for clients on Windows,
BSD, and Linux) would be a convenience for those using it for its
intended purpose.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-10-20 16:08:19 Re: per table random-page-cost?
Previous Message David Christensen 2009-10-20 16:02:02 Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql