Re: dblink memory leak

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dblink memory leak
Date: 2009-10-06 01:14:36
Message-ID: 4ACA99FC.3010907@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> I can't promise to make this change before 15 October, but I will get to
>> it before the end of CF3.
>
> Another possibility is that Itagaki Takahiro, who developed the
> original patch, might be willing to develop something along these
> lines instead.

Either way is fine -- good suggestion ;-)

> However, it does seem that that original patch will not be accepted,
> for the reason that the committers prefer the approach discussed
> upthread. Therefore, I am marking the "query cancel issues in dblink"
> patch as "Returned with Feedback".

Yes, thanks for doing that.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-10-06 01:34:36 CommitFest 2009-09: how do we close this one out?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-10-06 01:12:50 Re: 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?