Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Urban'ski <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Date: 2009-10-05 22:55:30
Message-ID: 4ACA7962.7090804@pjmodos.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>>
>>> One thing that seems like it's likely to be an annoyance in practice
>>> is the need to explicitly do DROP OWNED BY to get rid of pg_default_acl
>>> entries for a role to be dropped.
>>>
>> Yeah I am not happy about this either but there is not much we can do
>> about it. Btw I think in the version I sent in REASSIGN OWNED acted as
>> DROP OWNED for default ACLs.
>>
>
> IIRC it just threw a warning, which didn't seem tremendously useful to
> me.
>

Oh did it ? Then I must have discarded that idea for some reason. I
probably didn't want to be too pushy there.

--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2009-10-05 23:18:01 moving system catalogs to another tablespace
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-05 22:54:05 Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs